Saturday, May 15, 2021

Nayattu: Visualization of a Flawed Democracy

 


Nayattu’ directed by Martin Prakkat is a coming of age thriller that boldly and realistically portrays the politics of perception in the new age with the Khakhi thrown helplessly in the midst. The movie starts off  with introduction of its 3 main characters: Sunitha (Nimisha Sajayan), Praveen (Kunchako Boban) and Maniyan (Joju George), all 3 police officers with Maniyan at the top of hierarchy.

There are movies that shows us where we as a society should be, what we should strive to be through its characters and plot. Then there are movies that portrays realism in a brutal fashion even when it is discomforting and harsh. ‘Nayyatu’ is clearly the latter type of movie bringing to the viewers the operationalization of a flawed democracy at the ground level with battles of perception calling the ballot and lives of its ordinary citizens.

To take this message to the audience, the movie uses caste-based vote bank politics (in this case the Dalit vote bank although in Kerala generally there are more organized and united caste groups). In the opening sequences, the movie sets the stage for a power packed thriller, a fateful by election where the Dalit vote bank is crucial and a CM that is desperate to keep his seat of power.

The movie establishes the political subversion of the police force through a very convincing narrative and powerful dialogues. The scene where Maniyan laments to Praveen on his way to frame an innocent man that even gangsters have right to say no to quotations but alas we policemen don’t have that is quite hard hitting and telling. Throughout the movie, the entire police hierarchy seems compromised by the political class and its desires keeping in mind the by election.

However, this does not seem exaggerated as it could have been, given the earthly portrayal of an age of democracy where social media is powerful, public pressure is immense and media glare in election mode is sky high. The design of the system puts officers like Maniyan in pliable situations whereas he is shown in his masculine self against the ordinary citizens- the one without power or influence evidenced in a telling scene where he shows his muscle against his Dalit counterparts for defacing the police station wall.

The scene, a telling reminder about the cross-cutting inequalities that are built in a society where few who have been depressed have progressed and friction is not just between communities but also within- between those who have achieved and those who have lagged behind. Here, Maniyan is not a fellow Dalit despite him being so. He is in a position of power and that has changed the world, he is no longer the oppressed, he is the oppressor at least in the eyes of the community.

   

 From here, the movie takes off with an unfortunate death of a Dalit man throwing the trio into a runaway drama away from their normal life into the hills of Munnar. Maniyan, separated from his daughter for whom he harbors many a dream. The film movingly portrays the father’s love and pride for his girl child as well as his fears for her given he knows the worst of the world out there. The same protective web flows over to Sunitha who has her own troubles in a ‘manly’ world that wears her down at home and in office.

Like many women, she finds herself outnumbered by the other gender who are often hostile and insensitive. Naturally, she keeps to herself the fact that she is bleeding and in pain finding solace in a torn piece of loin cloth. The director tells this in an aptly sequenced scene with the host giving back her his mundu and Michael climbing the hills to get her what she wants even without her telling. The director creates a feel good narrative here in an otherwise somber film asking the audience to be empathetic and understanding of the other even when they feel discomforted to express and share.


The warmth is momentary as the movie sticks to the cold hands of justice that delays, frustrates, denies and is illusionary. When Moorthy tells Michael: “Why Police? They want evidence, documents, witnesses, we want only water”, it embodies the frustration of how justice delayed is worthless and how the common man would rather resort to muscle or dialogue rather than the law.

But the defining moment of Nayattu is the cross roads of justice and democracy. A famous quote of justice is- “Justice must not only be done, but also seem to be done”. The movie goes one step further to say- “Justice need not be done, it can just seem to be done” in the new age democracy where the perception battle through media is the most crucial. While the trio are apprehended eventually, what matters is not their innocence or guilt but whether the public anger is quelled, normalcy is restored and communities pacified especially when the ballot ring strikes.

The director gives this an incredible metaphoric ending like a crescendo where a blind woman is led to the voting machine. Her hand held by her son, she casts the vote not knowing whom she cast it for. This is symbolic of today’s democracy where truth is secondary to perception that is built on back of narrative, emotion, power and traditional social bases. The old lady symbolizes all of us, veiled from the truth, fed perception and hand held to vote by a superior force feeding on the haves and have nots of power.

Nayattu: Visualization of a Flawed Democracy

  ‘ Nayattu’ directed by Martin Prakkat is a coming of age thriller that boldly and realistically portrays the politics of perception in t...